Utility of the Actiwatch Spectrum Plus for detecting the outdoor environment and physical activity in children

Purpose To describe the performance of the Actiwatch Spectrum Plus (Philips, Respironics) for determining real world indoor and outdoor environments and physical activity in children. Methods Children wore the device while performing 10 different activities, ranging from sedentary to vigorous physical-activity, and under different indoor and outdoor conditions. Repeated measures ANOVA was implemented via mixed effects modeling to determine illuminance (lux) and physical activity (counts per 15 s, CP15) across conditions. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis assessed the accuracy to detect indoor versus outdoor settings. Results Illuminance was found to be statistically different across indoor (793 ± 348 lux) and outdoor (4,413 ± 518 lux) conditions (P<.0001), with excellent diagnostic accuracy to detect indoor versus outdoor settings (Area under the ROC Curve, AUC 0.94); 1088 lux was identified as the optimal threshold for outdoor illuminance (sensitivity: 93.0%; specificity: 85.0%). Using published activity ranges, we found that when children were sitting, 94% of the physical-activity readings were classified as sedentary or light. When children were walking, 88% of readings were classified as light, and when children were running, 77% of readings were classified as moderate or vigorous. Conclusion The Actiwatch Spectrum Plus performed well during real world activities in children, showing excellent diagnostic accuracy at 1088 lux as a threshold to detect indoor versus outdoor environments and in categorizing physical activity. (AU)

Utility of the Actiwatch Spectrum Plus for detecting the outdoor environment and physical activity in children.

PURPOSE: To describe the performance of the Actiwatch Spectrum Plus (Philips, Respironics) for determining real world indoor and outdoor environments and physical activity in children. METHODS: Children wore the device while performing 10 different activities, ranging from sedentary to vigorous physical-activity, and under different indoor and outdoor conditions. Repeated measures ANOVA was implemented via mixed effects modeling to determine illuminance (lux) and physical activity (counts per 15 s, CP15) across conditions. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis assessed the accuracy to detect indoor versus outdoor settings. RESULTS: Illuminance was found to be statistically different across indoor (793 ± 348 lux) and outdoor (4,413 ± 518 lux) conditions (P<.0001), with excellent diagnostic accuracy to detect indoor versus outdoor settings (Area under the ROC Curve, AUC 0.94); 1088 lux was identified as the optimal threshold for outdoor illuminance (sensitivity: 93.0%; specificity: 85.0%). Using published activity ranges, we found that when children were sitting, 94% of the physical-activity readings were classified as sedentary or light. When children were walking, 88% of readings were classified as light, and when children were running, 77% of readings were classified as moderate or vigorous. CONCLUSION: The Actiwatch Spectrum Plus performed well during real world activities in children, showing excellent diagnostic accuracy at 1088 lux as a threshold to detect indoor versus outdoor environments and in categorizing physical activity.

Baseline characteristics in the Israel refraction, environment, and devices (iREAD) study.

The purpose of this study is to present baseline data from a longitudinal study assessing behavioral factors in three groups of boys in Israel with varying myopia prevalence. Ultra-Orthodox (N = 57), religious (N = 67), and secular (N = 44) Jewish boys (age 8.6 ± 1.4 years) underwent cycloplegic autorefraction and axial-length measurement. Time-outdoors and physical-activity were assessed objectively using an Actiwatch. Ocular history, educational factors, and near-work were assessed with a questionnaire. Group effects were tested and mixed effects logistic and linear regression were used to evaluate behaviors and their relationship to myopia. The prevalence of myopia (≤ - 0.50D) varied by group (ultra-Orthodox: 46%, religious: 25%, secular: 20%, P < 0.021). Refraction was more myopic in the ultra-Orthodox group (P = 0.001). Ultra-Orthodox boys learned to read at a younger age (P < 0.001), spent more hours in school (P < 0.001), spent less time using electronic devices (P < 0.001), and on weekdays, spent less time outdoors (P = 0.02). Increased hours in school (OR 1.70) and near-work (OR 1.22), increased the odds of myopia. Being ultra-Orthodox (P < 0.05) and increased near-work (P = 0.007) were associated with a more negative refraction. Several factors were associated with the prevalence and degree of myopia in young boys in Israel, including being ultra-Orthodox, learning to read at a younger age, and spending more hours in school.

Objective quantification of viewing behaviours during printed and electronic tasks in emmetropic and myopic ultra-Orthodox Jewish men.

PURPOSE: Ultra-Orthodox Jewish men are known to have a high prevalence of myopia, which may be due to intense near-work from an early age. This study objectively assessed near-viewing behaviours in ultra-Orthodox and non-ultra-Orthodox men in Israel for different tasks. METHODS: Ultra-Orthodox (n = 30) and non-ultra-Orthodox (n = 38) men aged 18-33 years participated. Autorefraction, visual acuity, height and Harmon distance were measured. An objective range-finding sensor was mounted on their spectacles while they performed four 10-min tasks in a randomised order: (1) reading printed material, (2) writing printed material, (3) passive electronic and (4) active electronic tasks. Near-viewing distance and the number of viewing breaks were calculated for each task. Statistical analyses included Student t-tests and the Mann-Whitney test between groups and repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman between tasks. RESULTS: For all tasks combined, a significantly shorter viewing distance was observed for the ultra-Orthodox group (36.2 ± 7.0 cm) than for the non-ultra-Orthodox group (39.6 ± 6.7 cm, p < 0.05). Viewing distances for the passive reading and electronic tasks were shorter for the ultra-Orthodox group (36.9 ± 7.7 cm vs. 41.3 ± 8.1 cm, p < 0.03 and 39.0 ± 10.1 vs. 43.9 ± 9.3, p < 0.05, respectively). Viewing distances were significantly different between all four tasks, with writing having the closest distance. No correlation was found between working distance and spherical equivalent or Harmon distance. However, a significant correlation was found in the ultra-Orthodox group between working distance and height for each task (p < 0.04, R < 0.42 for all). There was no difference in the number of viewing breaks between the groups. CONCLUSION: When reading a book and viewing an iPad, ultra-Orthodox men demonstrated a closer objective working distance than non-ultra-Orthodox men. This shorter viewing distance may contribute to the high prevalence and degree of myopia in this population.

Revisiting the oil droplet sign in keratoconus: Utility for early keratoconus diagnosis and screening.

PURPOSE: An annular dark shadow (ADS) reflex has been observed while performing direct ophthalmoscopy on subjects with keratoconus. This study describes a method that may serve as a diagnostic technique for early keratoconus and may be used as a quantitative measure of severity. METHODS: Healthy keratoconic subjects and keratoconus suspects underwent corneal tomography and a full ocular examination. Keratoconus severity was graded based on Belin ABCD criteria. An iPhone camera was connected to a direct ophthalmoscope to take a picture of the eye. The height of the ASD was measured using the AutoCAD software. Differences between subject groups were evaluated by chi-squared and Mann-Whitney tests. Spearman correlation compared ocular parameters and the height of the ADS. A multiple stepwise linear regression was used to predict the height of the ADS based on clinical parameters. RESULTS: Fifty-eight subjects participated in this study: 37 healthy controls (37 eyes) and 21 keratoconics or keratoconus suspects (37 eyes). The ADS was present in all keratoconic and keratoconus-suspect eyes but in none of the controls. The height of the ADS was significantly correlated with keratoconus severity. Front corneal surface root mean square of higher order aberrations, sphere and anterior radius of curvature from the front apex curve are significant predictors of the height of the ADS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The ADS may be a useful method to diagnose keratoconus and keratoconus-suspect cases and serve as a grading and follow-up method for tracking disease severity.

The prevalence of refractive errors in college students in Israel

PurposeTo determine the prevalence of refractive errors in Jewish and Arab college students in Israel and associations with ethnicity and sex.MethodsIn this retrospective cross-sectional study, first-year college students underwent non-cycloplegic autorefraction and answered a questionnaire to assess age, sex, and self-identified ethnicity. Spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) was calculated, and the prevalence of hyperopia (>+0.50 Diopter, D), emmetropia (>-0.50 to +0.50 D), myopia (≤-0.50D, low ≤-0.50 to >-3.0D, moderate <-3.0 to >-6.0D, high ≤-6.0D), and astigmatism (>0.50D) were determined. Groups were compared using Chi-square or Fisher test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with refractive errors.ResultsParticipants (n = 807) had a mean age of 22.1 ± 2.6 years (range: 17–30 years) and SER of -1.7 ± 2.2D (range: -13.3 to +5.7D). The prevalence and 95% confidence internal of myopia was 66.3% (63.0–69.6). Jewish students had a higher prevalence than Arab students for myopia (69.2% vs 60.3%), moderate (18.5% vs 12.2%) and high myopia (5.9% vs 1.9%) and astigmatism (51.4% vs 43.9%, p<0.05 for all), but not low myopia or hyperopia. Females had a higher prevalence of myopia than males (68.1% vs 58.7%, p<0.03). Jewish ethnicity was associated with myopia (OR=1.48, p = 0.01) and moderate myopia (OR=1.72, p = 0.01), and studying optometry was associated with moderate myopia (OR=1.63, p = 0.02). Sex and age were not associated with myopia.ConclusionMyopia prevalence in Israeli college students is high, showing associations with Jewish, but not Arab, ethnicity, suggesting that ethnic factors may play a role in the refractive differences between Arabs and Jews. (AU)

The prevalence of refractive errors in college students in Israel.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of refractive errors in Jewish and Arab college students in Israel and associations with ethnicity and sex. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, first-year college students underwent non-cycloplegic autorefraction and answered a questionnaire to assess age, sex, and self-identified ethnicity. Spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) was calculated, and the prevalence of hyperopia (>+0.50 Diopter, D), emmetropia (>-0.50 to +0.50 D), myopia (≤-0.50D, low ≤-0.50 to >-3.0D, moderate <-3.0 to >-6.0D, high ≤-6.0D), and astigmatism (>0.50D) were determined. Groups were compared using Chi-square or Fisher test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with refractive errors. RESULTS: Participants (n = 807) had a mean age of 22.1 ± 2.6 years (range: 17-30 years) and SER of -1.7 ± 2.2D (range: -13.3 to +5.7D). The prevalence and 95% confidence internal of myopia was 66.3% (63.0-69.6). Jewish students had a higher prevalence than Arab students for myopia (69.2% vs 60.3%), moderate (18.5% vs 12.2%) and high myopia (5.9% vs 1.9%) and astigmatism (51.4% vs 43.9%, p<0.05 for all), but not low myopia or hyperopia. Females had a higher prevalence of myopia than males (68.1% vs 58.7%, p<0.03). Jewish ethnicity was associated with myopia (OR=1.48, p = 0.01) and moderate myopia (OR=1.72, p = 0.01), and studying optometry was associated with moderate myopia (OR=1.63, p = 0.02). Sex and age were not associated with myopia. CONCLUSION: Myopia prevalence in Israeli college students is high, showing associations with Jewish, but not Arab, ethnicity, suggesting that ethnic factors may play a role in the refractive differences between Arabs and Jews.

Agreement and inter-session repeatability of manual and automatic interpupillary distance measurements

Background: Interpupillary distance (IPD) is important in developmental anatomy, genetics, design of optical instrumentation, ocular diagnostics, and optical prescribing. IPD frequently is measured on different days, and by either automatic pupillometers (physiological measurement) or manual ruler (anatomical measurement). Therefore, there is importance in the agreement and inter-session repeatability of manual and automatic IPD measurements.MethodsMonocular distance from the bridge of the nose and binocular distance and near binocular IPD were randomly measured, using a millimeter ruler and the Essilor Pupillon pupillometer. Gender effects were assessed using Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests, respectively. Agreement was assessed using Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman (B&A) plots. Thirty additional participants were tested within 1–2 weeks to determine the inter-session repeatability.ResultsThe agreement study included 199 participants (mean age: 24.1 ± 5.0 range: 19−53, 58 male, 141 female) and the repeatability sub- study included 30 (mean age: 27.9 ± 4.5, range: 23–39, 6 male, 24 female). Males and females significantly differed in age (<2 year mean difference (md)) and IPD (monocular md: < 1 mm, binocular md: < 2 mm). Manual vs. automatic measurements were significantly different for all conditions (md: <1 mm for all) except for distance left eye male PD. There was no significant difference between the session for both methods.ConclusionsBinocular and monocular manual and automatic measurements were significantly different statistically, but not clinically. Distance binocular IPD was approximately 3 mm wider than near IPD. Male binocular IPD was approximately 2 mm wider than the female IPD. Both methods had good inter-session repeatability. (AU)

Objective Behavioral Measures in Children before, during, and after the COVID-19 Lockdown in Israel.

Studies using questionnaires report that COVID-19 restrictions resulted in children spending significantly less time outdoors. This study used objective measures to assess the impact of pandemic-related restrictions on children's behavior. A total of 19 healthy 8-12-year-old boys were observed before and during social restriction periods. Of these, 11 boys were reassessed after restrictions were lifted. For each session, Actiwatches were dispensed for measures of time outdoors, activity, and sleep. Changes overall and by school status were assessed using signed-rank test and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. During restrictions, children spent significantly less time outdoors (p = 0.001), were less active (p = 0.001), and spent less time engaged in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (p = 0.004). Sleep duration was not significantly different between sessions (p > 0.99), but bedtime and wake time shifted to a later time during restrictions (p < 0.05 for both). Time outdoors and activity returned close to pre-pandemic levels after restrictions were lifted (p > 0.05 for both). Children's behaviors significantly changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The reduction in outdoor light exposure is of importance due to the role of light in the etiology of myopia and vitamin D production. The reduction in physical activity may have negative health effects in terms of obesity and depression, although further research is required to ascertain the long-term effects.

Environmental and Behavioral Factors with Refractive Error in Israeli Boys.

SIGNIFICANCE: Evidence supporting the contributions of near work in myopia is equivocal. Findings from this pilot study suggest that a high prevalence of myopia in ultra-Orthodox boys may be attributed to intense near work at school and learning to read in preschool at an early age. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess factors that may influence myopia in three groups of Jewish boys with different educational demands. METHODS: Healthy ultra-Orthodox, religious, and secular Jewish boys (n = 36) aged 8 to 12 years participated. Refractive status, education, time spent reading and writing, and electronic device use were assessed using a questionnaire, and time outdoors and physical activity were assessed objectively using an Actiwatch. Data were analyzed with χ2 and Kruskal-Wallis tests with Bonferroni post hoc comparisons. RESULTS: Ultra-Orthodox (n = 14) and religious (n = 13) children had greater myopia prevalence compared with secular children (n = 9; P = .01), despite no differences in parental myopia. Actigraph data showed that there were no differences in activity (P = .52) or time spent outdoors (P = .48) between groups. Ultra-Orthodox children learned to read at a younger age and spent more hours at school (P < .001 for both). All groups engaged in a similar amount of near work while not in school (P = .52). However, ultra-Orthodox boys had less electronic device use than did religious (P = .007) and secular children (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates that ultra-Orthodox, religious, and secular children have distinct educational demands but similar time outdoors, physical activity, and near work while not in school. The findings suggest that near work at school and/or learning to read in preschool at an early age may contribute to previously reported differences in refractive error between groups. However, conclusions should be confirmed in a larger sample size.

Contrast sensitivity and higher-order aberrations in Keratoconus subjects.

This study analyzes the relationship between contrast-sensitivity and higher-order aberrations (HOA) in mild and subclinical-keratoconus in subjects with good visual-acuity (VA). Keratoconus group (including subclinical-keratoconus) and controls underwent autokeratometry, corneal-tomography, autorefraction and HOA measurement. Contrast-sensitivity was tested using a psychophysical two-alternative forced-choice Gabor patches in three blocks (6, 9, 12 cycles/deg). Controls were compared to the keratoconus group and to a keratoconus subgroup with VA of 0.00 LogMar group ("keratoconus-0.00VA"). Spearman correlation tested association between HOA and contrast-sensitivity. Twenty-two keratoconus subjects (38 eyes: 28 keratoconus, 10 subclinical-keratoconus, 20 keratoconus-0.00VA) and 35 controls were included. There was a significant difference between control and keratoconus, and between control and keratoconus-0.00VA, for keratometry, cylinder, thinnest and central corneal thickness (p < 0.001). Controls showed lower HOA and higher contrast-sensitivity for all spatial-frequencies (p < 0.001). Most HOA were negatively correlated with contrast-sensitivity for all spatial-frequencies for keratoconus group and for 9 and 12 cycles/deg for keratoconus-0.00VA. Keratoconus subjects with good VA showed reduction in contrast-sensitivity and increased HOAs compared to controls. HOA and contrast-sensitivity are inversely correlated in subjects with mild keratoconus despite good VA. This suggests that the main mechanism underlying the decreased vision quality in keratoconus is the increase of HOA.

Agreement and inter-session repeatability of manual and automatic interpupillary distance measurements.

BACKGROUND: Interpupillary distance (IPD) is important in developmental anatomy, genetics, design of optical instrumentation, ocular diagnostics, and optical prescribing. IPD frequently is measured on different days, and by either automatic pupillometers (physiological measurement) or manual ruler (anatomical measurement). Therefore, there is importance in the agreement and inter-session repeatability of manual and automatic IPD measurements. METHODS: Monocular distance from the bridge of the nose and binocular distance and near binocular IPD were randomly measured, using a millimeter ruler and the Essilor Pupillon pupillometer. Gender effects were assessed using Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests, respectively. Agreement was assessed using Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman (B&A) plots. Thirty additional participants were tested within 1-2 weeks to determine the inter-session repeatability. RESULTS: The agreement study included 199 participants (mean age: 24.1 ± 5.0 range: 19-53, 58 male, 141 female) and the repeatability sub- study included 30 (mean age: 27.9 ± 4.5, range: 23-39, 6 male, 24 female). Males and females significantly differed in age (<2 year mean difference (md)) and IPD (monocular md: < 1 mm, binocular md: < 2 mm). Manual vs. automatic measurements were significantly different for all conditions (md: <1 mm for all) except for distance left eye male PD. There was no significant difference between the session for both methods. CONCLUSIONS: Binocular and monocular manual and automatic measurements were significantly different statistically, but not clinically. Distance binocular IPD was approximately 3 mm wider than near IPD. Male binocular IPD was approximately 2 mm wider than the female IPD. Both methods had good inter-session repeatability.

The prevalence of corneal abnormalities in first-degree relatives of patients with keratoconus: a prospective case-control study.

PURPOSE: Although there is a high prevalence of keratoconus in the Middle East including Israel, limited data is available describing first-degree relatives of patients with sporadic keratoconus (KC) using Scheimpflug imaging. The purpose of this study is to accurately phenotype first-degree relatives of patients with sporadic KC in Israel using corneal tomography, which may help determine the genetic aetiology of KC. METHODS: First-degree relatives (N = 56) of 16 KC probands participated in this prospective case-control study. Healthy controls (N = 96) were from a previous study. Autorefraction, visual acuity, slit lamp biomicroscopy, retinoscopy, subjective refraction and Scheimpflug imaging (CSO Sirius Topographer) of keratoconus patients and their first-degree relatives were evaluated. The worse eye was used for KC and KC suspects. The main outcome measure was prevalence of abnormal corneal topography and tomography parameters, which was compared between first-degree relatives vs controls. p values < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: KC (N = 2) or KC suspect (N = 8) was diagnosed in 18% (95% CI 8-28%) of the first-degree relatives. At least one abnormal corneal parameter was evident in 34% of first-degree relatives, while this was significantly lower for controls (14%, χ2(1,N = 152)  = 8.8, p = 0.01). Qualitative analysis showed KC first-degree relatives had significantly more abnormal anterior corneal topography patterns than controls (34% vs 17%, χ2(1,N = 152)  = 5.9, p = 0.02). For first-degree relatives, sex was not a factor influencing prevalence of corneal abnormalities (18% for both men and women, χ2(1,N = 56)  = 0.0, p = 1.0). A significant correlation was found for first-degree relatives between age and most corneal parameters, while this was not evident for the control group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Eye care practitioners should consider first-degree relatives of patients with KC at moderate risk for the disease and/or corneal abnormalities.

The epidemiology and treatment of conjunctivitis at Urgent Care Centres in Israel.

Purpose: Conjunctivitis is the most common ocular condition diagnosed at emergency departments (ED) in the USA, although it is generally not an emergent condition. Treatment of conjunctivitis at Urgent Care Centres (UCC) could offer lower cost than ED. This study describes the demographics and outcomes of a cohort presenting with conjunctivitis to a nationwide UCC system. Methods: This retrospective study included 17 branches of UCC. Electronic Medical Record data (November 2015-October 2016) of patients diagnosed with conjunctivitis or ocular disorder were retrieved. Data included gender, age, diagnosis, treatment, discharge status and temperature. Patients without conjunctivitis, presenting to UCC during this period served as the control. Results were compared to all ED patients in Israel (from a public report). Descriptive statistics, Chi-square and Z-proportion test were used. Results: Altogether, 602,074 patients presented to UCC, of which 5,045 (0.84%, 95% CI 0.74-0.94%) were diagnosed with conjunctivitis. Conjunctivitis was more prevalent among young males (0-14, p<0.001) and older females. The conjunctivitis cohort at UCC was significantly younger than the ED cohort (p<0.01). UCC treated and released home 96.7% (95% CI 96.2-97.2%) of cases. This is significantly higher than the treatment rate for the entire UCC cohort (93.2%, CI 93.2-93.3%, p<0.05). Treatment in most cases (82.0%, 95% CI 80.9-83.0%) involved the prescription of ocular antibiotic. Conclusion: Similar to previous studies at ED, conjunctivitis patients are primarily young males. Most patients were treated with antibiotics at UCC and released home. This suggests that UCC may be a good venue for treatment of conjunctivitis.

Corneal and conjunctival injury seen in urgent care centres in Israel.

PURPOSE: Corneal and conjunctival injuries (CCI) comprise a large portion of the cases presenting to hospital-based emergency departments (ED) with ocular involvement. Urgent Care Centres (UCC) offer community based emergency care at lower cost than hospital-based emergency departments (ED) and with greater temporal convenience than primary care office settings. While CCI prevalence and treatment at hospital-based EDs has been well studied, this is the first report, to our knowledge, on CCI demographics and aetiology presenting to UCCs. METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. The setting is a UCC system in Israel, modelled on USA urgent care facilities, consisting of 17 branches at the time of the study. Electronic medical record data (between November 1, 2015 and October 31, 2016) of patients diagnosed with corneal disorder, foreign body or eye disorder were retrieved and reviewed for inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data collected included gender, age, chief complaint, diagnosis, treatment and discharge status (sent home or referred to ED). International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes were assigned to each record based on a review of all fields. UCC results were compared to all ED patients in Israel using data from a public report. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 602 074 charts screened, 4797 patients presented with CCI (0.8%). The average age was 32.6 ± 18.2 years and 71.3% were male. Among these, 26.4% were referred to the ED compared to 6.8% from the entire UCC cohort. ICD-9 code Foreign body (FB) of the eye was the most common cause of CCI (56.5%) followed by the following ICD-9 codes: trauma (18.1%), chemical in the eye (11.1%) and corneal disorder due to a contact lens (5.1%). Logistic regression analyses showed the following risk factors for ED referral: age (22-64), male gender, ICD-9 code FB, work-related injury and the presence of a clinical abrasion in the eye. CONCLUSIONS: The aetiology of ocular injury at UCC is similar to previous studies of ED. Most CCI can be treated at UCC saving ED resources and underscores the importance of this mode of health care delivery in the overall health system.

Validation of refraction and anterior segment parameters by a new multi-diagnostic platform (VX120) / Validación de los parámetros de refracción y segmento anterior mediante una nueva plataforma multi-diagnóstica (VX120)

Background: The VX120 (Visionix Luneau, France) is a novel multi-diagnostic platform that combines Hartmann-Shack based autorefraction, Placido-disk based corneal-topography and anterior segment measurements made with a stationary-Scheimpflug camera. We investigate the agreement between different parameters measured by the VX120 with accepted or gold-standard techniques to test if they are interchangeable, as well as to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility. Methods: The right-eyes of healthy subjects were included in the study. Autorefraction of the X120 was compared to subjective refraction. Agreement of anterior segment parameters was compared to the Sirius (CSO, Italy) including autokeratometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), iridiocorneal angle (IA). Inter and intra-test repeatability of the above parameters was assessed. Results were analyzed using Bland and Altman analyses. Results: A total of 164 eyes were evaluated. The mean difference between VX120 autorefraction and subjective refraction for sphere, spherical equivalent (SE), and cylinder was 0.01 ± 0.43 D, 0.14 ± 0.47 D, and -0.26 ± 0.30 D, respectively and high correlation was found to all parameter (r > 0.75) except for J45 (r = 0.61). The mean difference between VX120 and the Sirius system for CCT, IA, and keratometry (k1 and k2) was -3.51 ± 8.64 μm, 7.6 ± 4.2°, 0.003 ± 0.06 mm and 0.004 ± 0.04 mm, respectively and high correlation was found to all parameter (r > 0.97) except for IA (r = 0.67). Intrasession repeatability of VX120 refraction, CCT, IA and keratometry yielded low within-subject standard deviations. Inter-session repeatability showed no statistically significant difference for most of the parameters measured. Conclusions: The VX120 provides consistent refraction and most anterior segment measurements in normal healthy eyes, with high levels of intra and inter-session repeatability

Antecedentes: VX120 (Visionix Luneau, Francia) es una plataforma multi-diagnóstico novedosa que combina la auto-refracción basada en Hartmann-Shack, la topografía corneal mediante discos de Plácido, y las mediciones del segmento anterior realizadas mediante cámara de Scheimpflug. Analizamos la concordancia entre los diferentes parámetros medidos por VX120 con las técnicas aceptadas o de referencia, para probar si eran intercambiables, y evaluamos la repetibilidad y reproducibilidad. Métodos: Se incluyeron en el estudio los ojos derechos de sujetos sanos. Se comparó la auto-refracción de VX120 con la refracción subjetiva. La concordancia de los parámetros del segmento anterior se comparó con la del sistema Sirius (CSO, Italia), incluyendo autoqueratometría, espesor corneal central (ECC) y ángulo iridiocorneal (AI). Se valoró la repetibilidad inter e intra-prueba de los parámetros anteriores. Los resultados se analizaron mediante el método de Bland-Altman. Resultados: Se evaluó un total de 164 ojos. La diferencia media entre la auto-refracción de VX120 y la refracción subjetiva para esfera, equivalente esférico (EE), y cilindro fue de 0,01 ± 0,43 D, 0,14± 0,47 D y -0,26 ± 0,3 D, respectivamente, encontrándose una elevada correlación entre todos los parámetros (r > 0,75) excepto para J45 (r = 0,61). La diferencia media entre VX120 y el sistema Sirius para ECC, AI, y queratometría (k1 y k2) fue de -3,51 ± 8,64 μm, 7,6 ± 4,2°, 0,003 ± 0,06 mm y 0,004 ± 0,04 mm, respectivamente, encontrándose una elevada correlación entre todos los parámetros (r > 0,97) excepto para AI (r = 0,67). La repetibilidad intra-sesión de la refracción VX120, ECC, AI y queratometría reflejó desviaciones estándar bajas entre sujetos. La repetibilidad inter-sesión no reflejó una diferencia significativa para la mayoría de los parámetros medidos. Conclusiones: VX120 aporta medidas consistentes de refracción y de la mayoría de las mediciones del segmento anterior en ojos sanos normales, con elevados niveles de repetibilidad intra e inter-sesión

Validation of refraction and anterior segment parameters by a new multi-diagnostic platform (VX120).

BACKGROUND: The VX120 (Visionix Luneau, France) is a novel multi-diagnostic platform that combines Hartmann-Shack based autorefraction, Placido-disk based corneal-topography and anterior segment measurements made with a stationary-Scheimpflug camera. We investigate the agreement between different parameters measured by the VX120 with accepted or gold-standard techniques to test if they are interchangeable, as well as to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility. METHODS: The right-eyes of healthy subjects were included in the study. Autorefraction of the VX120 was compared to subjective refraction. Agreement of anterior segment parameters was compared to the Sirius (CSO, Italy) including autokeratometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), iridiocorneal angle (IA). Inter and intra-test repeatability of the above parameters was assessed. Results were analyzed using Bland and Altman analyses. RESULTS: A total of 164 eyes were evaluated. The mean difference between VX120 autorefraction and subjective refraction for sphere, spherical equivalent (SE), and cylinder was 0.01±0.43D, 0.14±0.47D, and -0.26±0.30D, respectively and high correlation was found to all parameter (r>0.75) except for J45 (r=0.61). The mean difference between VX120 and the Sirius system for CCT, IA, and keratometry (k1 and k2) was -3.51±8.64µm, 7.6±4.2°, 0.003±0.06mm and 0.004±0.04mm, respectively and high correlation was found to all parameter (r>0.97) except for IA (r=0.67). Intrasession repeatability of VX120 refraction, CCT, IA and keratometry yielded low within-subject standard deviations. Inter-session repeatability showed no statistically significant difference for most of the parameters measured. CONCLUSIONS: The VX120 provides consistent refraction and most anterior segment measurements in normal healthy eyes, with high levels of intra and inter-session repeatability.

A survey of the criteria for prescribing in cases of borderline refractive errors / Encuesta sobre criterios de prescripción en casos de errores refractivos límite

Purpose: This research investigated the reported optometric prescribing criteria of Israeli optometrists. Methods: An online questionnaire based on previous studies was distributed via email and social networking sites to optometrists in Israel. The questionnaire surveyed the level of refractive error at which respondents would prescribe for different types of refractive error at various ages with and without symptoms. Results: 124 responses were obtained, yielding a response rate of approximately 12-22%, 92% of whom had trained in Israel. For all refractive errors, the presence of symptoms strongly influenced prescribing criteria. For example, for 10-20 year old patients the degree of hyperopia for which 50% of practitioners would prescribe is +0.75D in the presence of symptoms but twice this value (+1.50D) in the absence of symptoms. As might be expected, optometrists prescribed at lower degrees of hyperopia for older compared with younger patients. There was a trend for more experienced practitioners to be less likely to prescribe for lower degrees of myopia and presbyopia. Practitioner gender, country of training, the type of practice environment, and financial incentives were not strongly related to prescribing criteria. Conclusions: The prescribing criteria found in this study are broadly comparable with those in previous studies and with published prescribing guidelines. Subtle indications suggest that optometrists may become more conservative in their prescribing criteria with experience (AU)

Objetivo: Este estudio investigó los criterios de prescripción optométrica reportados por los optometristas israelíes. Métodos: Se distribuyó un cuestionario online basado en estudios previos, utilizando el correo electrónico y las redes sociales, a los optometristas de Israel. Dicho cuestionario sondeaba el nivel de error refractivo para el cual los encuestados realizarían prescripciones, para los diferentes tipos de error refractivo, a diversas edades y con variedad de síntomas. Resultados: Respondieron 124 personas, obteniéndose un índice de respuesta de aproximadamente el 12-22%. El 92% de los participantes se había formado en Israel. En hipermetropía, la presencia de síntomas influyó considerablemente en los criterios de prescripción. Por ejemplo, para pacientes de 10-20 años de edad, el grado de hipermetropía para el cual el 50% de los facultativos realizaría una prescripción sería de +0,75D en presencia de síntomas, pero se duplicaría este valor (+1,50D) en ausencia de ellos. Como cabría esperar, los optometristas prescribirían a personas mayores grados más bajos de hipermetropía, en comparación a las personas jóvenes. Los facultativos más experimentados reflejaron una tendencia de menor probabilidad de prescripción cuanto menor fuera el grado de miopía y presbicia. El sexo del facultativo, el país de formación, el tipo de entorno de práctica, y los incentivos financieros no guardaron una relación sólida con los criterios de prescripción. Los criterios de prescripción hallados en este estudio son ampliamente comparables a los de los estudios previos y a los de las guías publicadas. Conclusiones: Los criterios de prescripción optométrica en Israel pueden compararse a las recomendaciones de las guías publicadas por país de formación de los facultativos, profesional, género, o entorno laboral. Existen débiles indicadores que sugieren que los optometristas pueden volverse más conservadores, en cuanto a criterios de prescripción, con la experiencia (AU)

A survey of the criteria for prescribing in cases of borderline refractive errors.

PURPOSE: This research investigated the reported optometric prescribing criteria of Israeli optometrists. METHODS: An online questionnaire based on previous studies was distributed via email and social networking sites to optometrists in Israel. The questionnaire surveyed the level of refractive error at which respondents would prescribe for different types of refractive error at various ages with and without symptoms. RESULTS: 124 responses were obtained, yielding a response rate of approximately 12-22%, 92% of whom had trained in Israel. For all refractive errors, the presence of symptoms strongly influenced prescribing criteria. For example, for 10-20 year old patients the degree of hyperopia for which 50% of practitioners would prescribe is +0.75 D in the presence of symptoms but twice this value (+1.50 D) in the absence of symptoms. As might be expected, optometrists prescribed at lower degrees of hyperopia for older compared with younger patients. There was a trend for more experienced practitioners to be less likely to prescribe for lower degrees of myopia and presbyopia. Practitioner gender, country of training, the type of practice environment, and financial incentives were not strongly related to prescribing criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The prescribing criteria found in this study are broadly comparable with those in previous studies and with published prescribing guidelines. Subtle indications suggest that optometrists may become more conservative in their prescribing criteria with experience.